|
Even for students who receive Credits, Distinctions and High Distinctions, I strongly recommend giving yourself the gift of working with The Elephant. Yes, I meant the word ‘strongly’, because every Law student should be taught what The Elephant will teach you, and sadly we don’t get those lessons from our Ordinary Degree.
I was awarded membership to the Golden Key National Honour Society, for academic excellence in my undergraduate studies at the University of Adelaide. I engaged The Elephant recently and despite my achievements thus far, my skills and results improved quickly and significantly.
The Elephant provided timely and thorough feedback with clear examples of language, structure, referencing, research and accuracy. He has an efficient manner which is contagious - I found myself becoming a more efficient learner, researcher and writer, without even thinking about it.
I am enlightened as to the mystery of how to write excellent answers and receive higher grades. My effort is now focussed, resulting in concise and poignant submissions. I have confidence that the work I produce is hitting all the targets of what is expected, and I can be proud of my submissions.
The Elephant is a highly dedicated individual, whom I would describe as a personal study coach. He honoured every commitment, was punctual with information advice and feedback. I was inspired by his unwavering commitment to my success. I feel incredibly fortunate to know that such a highly qualified professional, with extensive experience, is willing to work with me, and genuinely support me to strive for exceptional learning and results.
Tania-Marie Emes BEc. Grad Dip Ed
University of Adelaide <tme708@gmail.com> |

|
"I was ready to cut my wrists until I met the elephant" Thank you so much for all the help you have given me. Now that I know what I am doing I actually found at times last night and this morning I was enjoying the notes and legal research, almost like a puzzle in a sense. Now that you’ve shown me how to research, my most recent assignment scored a 5.
Jonathan Parsons - QUT Gardens Point - email me to verify at <masashige42@live.com> |  |
Jon and Tanya,
Here are the comments in relation to the contracts assignment:
This is an excellent paper overall. It meets all the requirements of the assignment brief. It is a simple topic but very well analysed, structured and discussed. Content (Description and analysis of issues and cases) 38/40 - very good analysis of the current position of the law in the context of the online sphere. - good application of relevant case law and legislation. - reconciled reforms with issues raised. Grammar, syntax, punctuation, spelling 10/10 Citation and related technique 10/10 Style and structure 14/15 - good structure and use of headings. - There was a cohesive flow throughout the paper. - very good that you share your opinion along the way - good reflection. Research 22/25 - very well researched. - good management of research data. - improve:could have provided some comparative research in another jurisdiction. Total: 28/30
43 out of 45.
This is an outstanding result and I do thank you both so very much for you patience and assistance. Here's hoping for similar results in the other two assessments:-)
| Mark from Darwin |
|
So. Results came out tonight, and I thought I'd let you know I got a C for civil!!!! I'm so excited, I honestly thought I would fail. And the C is absolutely thanks to you! I wouldn't have had a hope at all if you hadn't helped me make sense of it all. I can't believe it, I really thought I's have to redo the subject. Thankfully civil is a hell I won't have to endure at a university level again!
Kate Mallinson (former La Trobe Student Ambassador) |

|